Author: Charles Parry, Nadine Harker Burnhams, Leslie London
Title: A total ban on alcohol advertising: Presenting the public health case
Journal: S Afr Med J 2012;102(7):602-604.
A full text pdf of this article is available here

AbstractOLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Evidence from burden of disease and economic costing studies amply indicate that the public health burden from hazardous and harmful use of alcohol in South Africa warrants drastic action. Evidence that banning alcohol advertising is likely to be an effective intervention is reflected in WHO strategy documents on non-communicable diseases and harmful use of alcohol. Studies on young people furthermore support arguments refuting the claim that advertising only influences brand choice. Given the weakness of relying on industry self-regulation, the government is considering legislation to ban alcohol advertising, resulting in heated debate. Tobacco control and studies investigating the effect of alcohol advertising bans on consumption and alcohol-related deaths point to the effectiveness of such action – ideally supplemented by other policy interventions. Arguments against an advertising ban include possible communication sector job losses, but these are likely to have been exaggerated. Banning alcohol advertising will necessitate greater scrutiny of digital media, satellite television and merchandising to reduce the likelihood of subverting the ban.

Email to someoneShare on FacebookGoogle+Share on LinkedInPrint this pageTweet about this on Twitter

Comments are closed.

Post Navigation